Non-Importation Agreements Were Brought About Following The Enactment Of The – Tuyuri Karin

Magicalinyつゆり花鈴
個人ウェブサイト

Non-Importation Agreements Were Brought About Following The Enactment Of The

2020年12月14日

In trying to obtain some sort of compensation for the settler`s debts, Britain created laws to offset the expenses for their end due to activities that mainly included the protection of the settlers. Two of them were the Quartering Act and the Stamp Act. While the Quartering Act reduced the cost of housing British soldiers, the Stamp Act put in place all official documents or documents produced inside the colonies to obtain income to repay some of the settler`s debts. These figures show the impact of the situation on trade. There was a great depression in the 1760s, when the majority of non-import and taxation battles fought. Nevertheless, it is assumed that non-importation and the resulting depression were not only caused by unpopular acts. During this period, creditors and the investor asked for their money from colonial importers who were unable to repay their debts. To raise more money, they made the non-import so that they could sell their shares at higher prices. The parade took place with the passage of the Townshend Revenue Act in June 1767. It imposed new tariffs on products such as salt, glass, paper, tea, coal, oil and lead. The revenues from these tasks would be used as wages for colonial governors, judges and troops.

Unlike the Stamp Act, the Townshend Revenue Act unfortunately attracted far less attention and received little criticism or objection when it was implemented at the end of November 1767. This lack of resistance was caused by the fact that few people (traders and traders) were affected by this law. Rebecca Beatrice Brooks (2015-12-09). “Who were the daughters of freedom.” Call on November 18, 2018. As early as 1766, the practice of non-import agreements against the importation and trade with Great Britain of the cities of the American colonies was adopted. The sons of freedom were proponents of the application of non-import agreements and other similar boycott tactics. The Stamp Act was repealed because of joint non-import agreements by U.S. colonies.

New York merchants first implemented the non-import agreement to protest the Stamp Act, and they managed to convince merchants in other cities to do the same. Boston was one of the new York merchant cities that were convinced to participate in the non-import agreement to fight the Stamp Act. Following the successful boycott and pressure from British traders who lost money, Britain gave in and eventually cancelled the Stamp Act. Once again, the settlers were outraged. In response, twelve of the thirteen colonies formed the First Continental Congress, where they drew up a list of complaints against the Crown and the provisions they would make until the legislative power was changed. One of these provisions was the non-consumption agreements, which ensured that the colonies would not import British products and would not export goods to Britain and its colonies if Britain did not rescind its previously adopted laws. In particular, the Sugar Act had a negative effect on imports in trade between colonies and third countries. It has halved the cost of importing molasses into the country. However, American settlers had avoided the previous tax, and although the Sugar Act reduced tariffs on molasses, it reached a higher level of enforcement. It also imposed taxes on imports that were not previously taxed and put the UK`s hand in the hands of important U.S. exports such as wood.

In the months and years to come, this non-import initiative was adopted by other cities, New York joined the same year, Philadelphia followed a year later. However, Boston remained the leader to form an opposition to the metropolis and its fiscal policy.

もどるよ!